Monday, October 14, 2013

LTSG

LADYBUGS, TONADOES, AND SWIRLING GALAXIES
As a teacher that has never taught ELL (English Language Learners) or CLD (Culturally and Linguistically Diverse) students I found this text very useful. I like that the authors, Buhrow and Garcia, state that “many of these approaches are simply good practices and can be successfully implemented with all students.” I have learned that students enter our classroom with minimal, yet very valuable background knowledge and teacher should consider this knowledge as they prepare to teach. The experiences that children bring into the classroom regardless of the type of student she/he may be should offer diversity in a manner that offers opportunity to enhance the lives of those she/he may encounter during their school day. I feel that modeling the expectations of the classroom is very important. The authors used many prompts to catch the attention of the student and encourage a higher order of thinking and create a “reciprocal learning environment.”
The focus on connections to life experiences stood out throughout my reading. In the beginning of relating to the students by setting up the classroom environment, to developing routines that create a culture of thinkers, to moving into engaging in writing and telling stories, to comprehension Buhrow and Garcia constantly emphasized the importance of connections. I would love to incorporate the way the authors started the morning with the daily news! I feel this would offer my students an opportunity to become more capable of thinking about the activities of their day, or even what comes next during a particular time of the day. Buhrow and Garcia discuss in chapter 3 that “this routine allows the kids to contribute to writing, reading, listening, and speaking activity that is all about them.”  In chapter 4 they show that connections help to      “see the kids going to a deeper level of sophistication with their questions and with their reading and writing when they have background knowledge and genuine interest in a topic.” The children whether they are ELL, SN or general education should always feel connected to their learning experience.
Swirling thoughts of the nonfiction books used in the classroom to reach and connect to the ELL students lead me to think about the lack of fantasy or imagination. Most cultures have a way of relating fantasy and reality into the minds of children to encourage them to make connections to life experiences using both fiction and nonfiction. I understand the reasoning given for the students to use nonfiction, yet when Buhrow and Garcia stated that their use of nonfiction “ is not simply the standard definition of nonfiction texts that one would normally think of,” I became puzzled. They further discussed the incorporation of Paolo Freire’s theory of a literacy program. Although I understand the concept and even agree to the methods of reaching the students, I am still puzzled by the use of the term nonfiction. Most of the examples given referred to daily experiences of the students in the classroom while creating connections that encourage higher order of thinking. In my classroom after reading a poem, book or even a discussion about a child’s prior days event we make connections to what is being learned in the classroom to enhance the student’s comprehension as well as encourage more engagement in the conversation. Is this the nonfiction they are referring to?  Are they using real life experiences and connections to such through literacy as their use of nonfiction?  

In chapter 3 they discuss more how nonfiction text is used to offer richer connections to words, pictures, text amongst other things. They talk about nonfiction offering a deeper connections to the content being taught or even teaching the features of nonfiction to increase comprehension and connections for the ELL student. I am concerned that aside from the nonfiction features all these other things such as words, pictures, text, connections and comprehension could also be made using fiction books. I feel that incorporation of both would help the ELL student make even great connections “because we all have different life experiences.”